Reviewer responsibilities
Reviewers must maintain manuscript confidentiality, provide objective and constructive assessments, and declare conflicts of interest. They must not use unpublished information for personal or professional advantage and must alert the editor to suspected plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated data, or other ethical concerns.
Authorship and contributions
OMJ follows all four ICMJE authorship criteria. Every author must make substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; draft the manuscript or critically revise it for important intellectual content; approve the final version; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions about its accuracy or integrity are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Contributors who do not meet all four criteria may be acknowledged but must not be listed as authors. Gift, guest, and ghost authorship are unacceptable. Changes in authorship after submission require justification and approval from all authors and, where appropriate, the Editor-in-Chief.
Originality, plagiarism and duplicate publication
Submissions must be original, must not have been published previously, and must not be under consideration by another journal. OMJ does not tolerate plagiarism, self-plagiarism, fabrication or falsification of data, duplicate or redundant publication, salami publication, citation manipulation, or image manipulation intended to misrepresent findings.
Manuscripts may be screened using appropriate plagiarism-detection software. Suspected misconduct is investigated according to applicable COPE guidance; authors' institutions or other relevant authorities may be contacted when necessary.
OMJ will use iThenticate to screen submitted manuscripts for text similarity as part of its editorial assessment. Editors will review identified matches in context, considering citations, quotations, and attribution. A similarity score alone does not determine whether plagiarism has occurred.
Research ethics
Research involving human participants must comply with internationally accepted ethical principles and applicable national regulations. Authors must provide details of Institutional Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board approval, informed consent where applicable, protection of participant confidentiality, and clinical trial registration where applicable.
Animal research must meet applicable institutional and national standards for ethical treatment. The Editor may request supporting documentation when ethical compliance is unclear.
Informed consent for publication
Written informed consent is required whenever individuals can be identified from case reports, photographs, videos, pedigrees, or other identifiable information. Authors must anonymize personal information wherever possible.
Conflicts of interest
Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose financial, personal, professional, or other relationships that could influence, or appear to influence, the conduct, review, or publication of the work. OMJ encourages use of the ICMJE Disclosure Form. Reviewers and editors with a significant conflict must recuse themselves from the relevant manuscript.
Editors must not participate in decisions about manuscripts in which they have a personal, professional, or financial interest. An independent editor will be assigned when necessary to ensure an impartial process.
Funding and sponsorship
Authors must declare all financial and material support. Where applicable, they must state the funder's role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, and the decision to publish.
Data availability and research integrity
Authors should retain research data and supporting documentation and make data available when ethically and legally permissible. Authors are encouraged to follow established reporting guidelines and register clinical trials and other prospective studies where appropriate.
The journal may request clarification, underlying data, or supporting information when concerns arise about the integrity or reproducibility of published findings.
Artificial intelligence and generative AI
Authors must disclose AI or generative AI tools used in manuscript preparation when relevant to the submitted work. AI tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot assume responsibility for accuracy, integrity, and originality.
Authors remain fully responsible for all manuscript content, including verifying AI-generated material, references, and statements. Any use of AI to generate or manipulate research data, images, or results must be disclosed and comply with applicable research-integrity requirements.
Complaints and appeals
Authors and other stakeholders may raise concerns or appeal editorial decisions. Complaints concerning the journal, editors, reviewers, or editorial processes should be submitted to the Editor-in-Chief and will be handled fairly, confidentially, and in a timely manner.
Where appropriate, unresolved matters may be referred to the journal's governing body or the relevant institutional or professional authority.
Allegations of misconduct
OMJ takes allegations seriously before and after publication. These may concern plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, duplicate publication, unethical research, authorship manipulation, undisclosed conflicts, or inappropriate manipulation of images or data.
Allegations are assessed objectively. The journal may seek explanations from authors, reviewers, institutions, or other relevant parties, and will take appropriate corrective action when misconduct is confirmed.
Corrections, retractions and expressions of concern
A correction or erratum addresses a significant error that does not invalidate the main conclusions. A retraction addresses unreliable findings arising from major error or misconduct, or serious violations of publication ethics. An expression of concern addresses substantial unresolved concerns requiring further investigation.
Corrections and retractions will be clearly linked to the original article to maintain the integrity and transparency of the published scientific record.
Post-publication discussion
OMJ welcomes responsible scholarly discussion of published articles. Readers may communicate substantive concerns through correspondence or letters to the editor. The editorial team assesses these concerns and, where appropriate, investigates them according to relevant publication-ethics guidance.